World Anti-Doping Code Commentary Project

The first fully comprehensive resource for anti-doping practitioners, providing guidance along all steps of the doping control process. With topics ranging from signatory compliance to application of the sanctioning regime, the commentary will assist the anti-doping movement to achieve a more effective implementation and harmonized interpretation of the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code.

  • ABOUT US
    • ABOUT THE TEAM
    • ABOUT THE PROJECT
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • ANTI-DOPING BLOG
  • CONTACT US
World Anti-Doping Code Commentary World Anti-Doping Code Commentary

Slide 2

Home/Slide 2
­
Previous Next

Slide 2

By WADC Commentary Team|2013-10-14T14:55:48+00:00October 14th, 2013|Comments Off on Slide 2

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

About the Author: WADC Commentary Team

With the key output of an article-by-article commentary on the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code, the project is unique in its ambitious scope and nature of the research undertaken. The project team will collect and analyze anti-doping case law that interprets and applies the 2015 WADA Code, primarily those decisions published by the Court of Arbitration for Sport, as well as from various jurisdictions around the world. The goal is to create the first fully comprehensive resource for anti-doping practitioners, providing guidance along all steps of the doping control process.

Related Posts

  • Can an Athlete be Provisionally Suspended before (even) being charged with an anti-doping rule violation?
    Permalink
    Gallery

    Can an Athlete be Provisionally Suspended before (even) being charged with an anti-doping rule violation?

  • Permalink

    First draft of the 2021 World Anti-Doping Code: Not so light of a review?

  • The Johaug CAS award: Too harsh?
    Permalink
    Gallery

    The Johaug CAS award: Too harsh?

  • The Ademi CAS award: One substance? No source? No problem.
    Permalink
    Gallery

    The Ademi CAS award: One substance? No source? No problem.

  • The Significance of Maria Sharapova’s Fault
    Permalink
    Gallery

    The Significance of Maria Sharapova’s Fault

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Popular
  • Recent
  • The Stewart CAS Award: “Paperwork” Violations and Principles Surrounding “Retrospective” Therapeutic Use Exemptions
    June 15th, 2015
  • Can an Athlete be Provisionally Suspended before (even) being charged with an anti-doping rule violation?
    September 11th, 2018
  • First draft of the 2021 World Anti-Doping Code: Not so light of a review?
    June 25th, 2018
  • Can an Athlete be Provisionally Suspended before (even) being charged with an anti-doping rule violation?
    September 11th, 2018
  • First draft of the 2021 World Anti-Doping Code: Not so light of a review?
    June 25th, 2018
  • The Johaug CAS award: Too harsh?
    November 10th, 2017
  • The Ademi CAS award: One substance? No source? No problem.
    September 22nd, 2017
  • The Significance of Maria Sharapova’s Fault
    November 23rd, 2016
  • Cocaine blues: What the Paolini case suggests about “recreational” drug use under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code
    August 19th, 2016
  • Meldonium and Moral Fault: Five Lessons Learned from the Sharapova ITF Tribunal Decision
    June 10th, 2016
  • Talk is Cheap: The Daiders CAS Award on the Evidence Needed for a Contaminated Supplement Defense
    October 13th, 2015
  • The ISSF v. WADA CAS Award: Another Therapeutic Use Exemption Request for Beta Blockers Shot Down
    August 10th, 2015
  • The Stewart CAS Award: “Paperwork” Violations and Principles Surrounding “Retrospective” Therapeutic Use Exemptions
    June 15th, 2015
  • The Lallukka CAS Award: The End of an Unsettled Era for Human Growth Hormone Cases?
    April 29th, 2015
  • Biological passports and the 2015 Code: Will four-year bans for blood doping become the new norm?
    February 3rd, 2015
  • When is a Departure Really a Departure? Trends in Procedural Challenges Highlighted by the Tai Cheau Xuen CAS Award
    December 1st, 2014
  • Still need proof sugar is bad for you? Cilic, glucose, “light” fault, and four months out
    October 23rd, 2014
  • Ain’t nobody’s fault: Van Snick’s cocaine-sabotaged sports supplement
    July 4th, 2014
  • FIFA, anti-doping and the World Cup 2014: Deco v. CBF and FIFA
    May 26th, 2014
  • The Pinzon award: When legal presumptions fail under the force of scientific evidence
    April 7th, 2014
  • Strict liability swings both ways: Campbell-Brown award expects ADOs to match exacting standards imposed on Athletes
    February 24th, 2014
  • Sinkewitz v. Veerpalu: Struggling to fit anti-doping science into a legal framework
    February 24th, 2014
  • The Glaesner award: Another case of mistaken identity involving a Vicks inhaler
    January 31st, 2014
  • No comments have been published yet.

Archives

  • September 2018
  • June 2018
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • November 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • June 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • July 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014

WADC Commentary Project

Av. du 1er-Mars 26 (bureau B37), 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland

Phone: + 41 32 718 12 00

Email: info@wadc-commentary.com

Web: wadc-commentary.com

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.