Medium Alternate

6:23 am6:23 am

Permalink
Gallery
Can an Athlete be Provisionally Suspended before (even) being charged with an anti-doping rule violation?

Proportionality, Provisional Suspension

Can an Athlete be Provisionally Suspended before (even) being charged with an anti-doping rule violation?

By WADC Commentary Team|2018-09-11T07:17:59+00:00September 11th, 2018|Proportionality, Provisional Suspension|0 Comments

CAS 2017/A/4968, Alexander Legkov v. International Ski Federation (FIS), Award of 31 August 2017 (Operative [...]

12:50 pm12:50 pm

First draft of the 2021 World Anti-Doping Code: Not so light of a review?

By WADC Commentary Team|2018-06-25T13:05:14+00:00June 25th, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments

On 4 June 2018, WADA opened the second phase of the review process for the [...]

5:00 pm5:00 pm

Permalink
Gallery
The Johaug CAS award: Too harsh?

No Fault or Negligence, No Significant Fault or Negligence, Proportionality

The Johaug CAS award: Too harsh?

By WADC Commentary Team|2017-11-10T19:03:37+00:00November 10th, 2017|No Fault or Negligence, No Significant Fault or Negligence, Proportionality|0 Comments

CAS 2017/A/5110, International Ski Federation (FIS) v. Therese Johaug & The Norwegian Olympic and Paralympic [...]

9:00 am9:00 am

Permalink
Gallery
The Ademi CAS award: One substance? No source? No problem.

Intentional violations, No Significant Fault or Negligence

The Ademi CAS award: One substance? No source? No problem.

By WADC Commentary Team|2017-09-22T14:56:39+00:00September 22nd, 2017|Intentional violations, No Significant Fault or Negligence|0 Comments

CAS 2016/A/4676, Arijan Ademi v. UEFA, 24 March 2017. In the Ademi award, the main [...]

5:12 pm5:12 pm

Permalink
Gallery
The Significance of Maria Sharapova’s Fault

No Significant Fault or Negligence

The Significance of Maria Sharapova’s Fault

By WADC Commentary Team|2016-11-23T17:53:59+00:00November 23rd, 2016|No Significant Fault or Negligence|0 Comments

CAS Award: CAS 2016/A/4643, Maria Sharapova v. ITF, 30 September 2016. This Court of Arbitration [...]

8:02 am8:02 am

Permalink
Gallery
Cocaine blues: What the Paolini case suggests about “recreational” drug use under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code

No Significant Fault or Negligence

Cocaine blues: What the Paolini case suggests about “recreational” drug use under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code

By WADC Commentary Team|2016-08-19T15:21:26+00:00August 19th, 2016|No Significant Fault or Negligence|0 Comments

The Paolini decision, which was decided by the Union Cycliste Internationale’s (“UCI”) anti-doping tribunal (the [...]